In SEBI Sahara
Case, today SEBI started its arguments on the contempt petition filed by SEBI alleging
violation of the SC order dated 5-12-12 by Sahara. At the closing of arguments,
counsel for SEBI stated that the arguments made by him also covered the contempt
petitions earlier filed alleging breach of the order dated 31-8 -12 and argued
that Shri Subrata Roy Sahara should also be held liable, besides the directors
for the contempt. The Court however did not issue notice of contempt against Mr
Subrata Roy Sahara, on the second contempt Petition.
Whilst referring
to affidavit filed by Sahara on 4-1-12, SEBI argued that in the said affidavit
undertaking has been given, which has been violated. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also enquired with
SEBI, as to how the said other group companies, which are independent legal
entities, are bound by the said affidavit, filed by the two Sahara companies. Counsel for SEBI indicated that this issue
will be addressed by him separately.
SEBI referred to
an advertisement appeared in the news paper on 3rd Sept. 2012
calling it as an instance of contemptuous conduct of Sahara. The Hon’ble Court,
on referring to the said publication, observed that the same does not amount to
contempt and indicated that SEBI may not read further advertisements.
0 comments:
Post a Comment